Much has been said about the color-coded "traffic light" food labeling system that looks to give consumers a more vivid way to see what goes into their food, and if they're getting the right amount of nutrition per serving.
A piece in Phys.org looks at some possible negative effects of this labeling system, based on recent information out of multiple European countries.
Moreso, the traffic light labels can be seen as inaccurately representing the contents of a food package and leaving too much unrepresented. Dr. Jutta Roosen of the German institute Technische Universität München noted that traffic light labels shouldn't be assumed to be the final word on a product's nutrition content.
"In this case, the labeling has a simplifying effect," Dr. Roosen said. "The traffic light creates a false sense of security and prompts consumers to ignore more complex product information. In research, we refer to a halo effect here: one positive attribute outshines everything else."
This is important for companies and regulatory agencies to consider, because leaning too hard on one strategy can prove to be ineffective, even with the right color label printer purchased and enabled at your factories.
One of the thoughts is that by instituting these labels the levels of diabetes and dangerous health conditions could be successfully reduced. This could also be a way to account for the "stealth calories" that come from sugars that aren't necessarily documented on the regular labels.
However it can still be important to find a Primera label printer, in case these kinds of initiatives do actually become mandatory. Companies should think about how they can follow the standards laid out by policy while still making the customer the priority.
Leave a Reply