Whether genetically modified organisms (GMOs) should be used in the growing of certain crops is still a source of much contention, and will most likely continue to be now that a proposed amendment to make specific food labels for these types of products has been struck down.
Though people like Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont have pushed for the ability to identify these modified products with proper food labels, both government agencies like the FDA and the companies that create chemically engineered foods, specifically the controversial Monsanto, claim that they are safe for consumption.
On his official website, Senator Sanders posted a release describing the situation. Though his measure was voted down by a count of 71 to 27, he is reportedly determined to pursue this further.
“An overwhelming majority of Americans favor GMO labeling but virtually all of the major biotech and food corporations in the country oppose it,” the senator said. “Today’s vote is a step forward on an important issue that we are going to continue to work on.” Sander’s release also points out that other countries do currently require such labeling, particularly in Europe.
No matter what the outcome of this push for disclosure, food distributors can attempt to avoid controversy by making sure labels for natural foods are cleanly presented and keep consumers informed. If it’s a description of low sodium levels or a declaration of where the product was grown, the use of a Primera LX900 color label printer can help manufacturers avoid vague descriptors and give their customers the concrete facts they need.